People v. Curry

162 A.D.2d 957, 559 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9680
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Curry. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 A.D.2d 466

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 160.10) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Denman, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Curry, 162 A.D.2d 957, 559 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

162 A.D.2d 957 (People v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)