People v. Curry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Curry

42 A.D.2d 514, 344 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1973

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 A.D.2d 514 (People v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Curry, 42 A.D.2d 514, 344 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 11, 1972, denying, ■ without a hearing, defendant’s motion for a writ of error coram noibis, unanimously vacated, on the law, and, in the interest of justice, the purported appeal therefrom is treated as an application, pursuant to GPL 460.30, for an éxtension of time to take an appeal from the judgment of said court rendered on February 24, 1971, and such application granted, and the time to appeal extended until 30 days from the date of entry of the order hereon. In the event defendant elects to take and prosecute such' appeal, the same may be heard on the original record and upon reproduced appellant’s points. Counsel previously assigned to defendant by order of this court entered on June 8, 1972 shall continue as counsel for the purposes of the appeal. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to manslaughter in the second degree to cover an indictment charging him with felony murder and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to. exceed 10 years. Defendant was advised of his right to appeal. He claims he instructed his attorney to file a notice of appeal, but that such instruction was disregarded. Defendant then applied for coram nobis relief, which was denied by the sentencing court. In view of the fact that the application below was made in October, 1971, after the effective date of the Criminal Procedure Law, and was based on the alleged improper conduct of defendant’s counsel, the sentencing court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application (GPL 460.30). However, since defendant seeks a reduction of sentence, an appropriate “viable claim” has been presented for appellate review (People v. Colman, 30 N Y 2d 582). Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we treat the instant appeal as- an application for an extension of time to take an appeal from the judgment of conviction; and such time is hereby extended until 30 days from the date of the order entered hereon. In the event defendant elects to take and prosecute such appeal, the same may be heard on the original record and upon reproduced appellant’s points. Counsel previously assigned to defendant shall continue as counsel for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 11, 1972, denying, ■ without a hearing, defendant’s motion for a writ of error coram noibis, unanimously vacated, on the law, and, in the interest of justice, the purported appeal therefrom is treated as an application, pursuant to GPL 460.30, for an éxtension of time to take an appeal from the judgment of said court rendered on February 24, 1971, and such application granted, and the time to appeal extended until 30 days from the date of entry of the order hereon. In the event defendant elects to take and prosecute such' appeal, the same may be heard on the original record and upon reproduced appellant’s points. Counsel previously assigned to defendant by order of this court entered on June 8, 1972 shall continue as counsel for the purposes of the appeal. Defendant was permitted to plead guilty to manslaughter in the second degree to cover an indictment charging him with felony murder and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not to. exceed 10 years. Defendant was advised of his right to appeal. He claims he instructed his attorney to file a notice of appeal, but that such instruction was disregarded. Defendant then applied for coram nobis relief, which was denied by the sentencing court. In view of the fact that the application below was made in October, 1971, after the effective date of the Criminal Procedure Law, and was based on the alleged improper conduct of defendant’s counsel, the sentencing court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application (GPL 460.30). However, since defendant seeks a reduction of sentence, an appropriate “viable claim” has been presented for appellate review (People v. Colman, 30 N Y 2d 582). Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we treat the instant appeal as- an application for an extension of time to take an appeal from the judgment of conviction; and such time is hereby extended until 30 days from the date of the order entered hereon. In the event defendant elects to take and prosecute such appeal, the same may be heard on the original record and upon reproduced appellant’s points. Counsel previously assigned to defendant shall continue as counsel for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez, Kupferman and Murphy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 514, 344 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-curry-nyappdiv-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack