People v. Currey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Currey

115 A.D.2d 552, 496 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54961

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 552 (People v. Currey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Currey, 115 A.D.2d 552, 496 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered July 11, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[553]*553Judgment affirmed.

The evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The People did not have to prove that defendant knew that his accomplice intended to threaten the immediate use of a dangerous instrument to establish his guilt of robbery in the first degree (see, People v Parker, 97 AD2d 943).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered July 11, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[553]*553Judgment affirmed.

The evidence was sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The People did not have to prove that defendant knew that his accomplice intended to threaten the immediate use of a dangerous instrument to establish his guilt of robbery in the first degree (see, People v Parker, 97 AD2d 943).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 552, 496 N.Y.S.2d 695, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-currey-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack