People v. Current

703 N.W.2d 470, 474 Mich. 863
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 21, 2005·No. 127119·Published

Opinion

703 N.W.2d 470 (2005)

PEOPLE v. CURRENT.

No. 127119.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 21, 2005.

Application for Leave to Appeal

SC: 127119, COA: 246039.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant *471 to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the decision of the Court of Appeals and defendant's convictions, and we REMAND this case to the Shiawassee Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this order. The trial court erred by utilizing the rape-shield statute, MCL 750.520j, to refuse to admit evidence of the prior sexual assaults on the complainant. "We recognize that in certain limited situations, such evidence may not only be relevant, but its admission may be required to preserve a defendant's constitutional right to confrontation." People v. Hackett, 421 Mich. 338, 348, 365 N.W.2d 120 (1984). This case presents such a situation.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Current, 703 N.W.2d 470, 474 Mich. 863 (Mich. 2005).

703 N.W.2d 470 (People v. Current) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hackett
365 N.W.2d 120 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1985)