People v. Curio
This text of 224 A.D. 766 (People v. Curio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Nassau county, and order denying motion for a new trial, unanimously affirmed. The evidence presented upon the trial was ample to uphold the finding of the jury upon the [767]*767charge of keeping a disorderly house. As the sentence was no more than could have been imposed for that crime, the question whether the evidence is sufficient to uphold the finding of the jury upon the charge of maintaining a public nuisance becomes immaterial. (Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-curio-nyappdiv-1928.