People v. Curio

224 A.D. 766

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Nassau county, and order denying motion for a new trial, unanimously affirmed. The evidence presented upon the trial was ample to uphold the finding of the jury upon the [767] charge of keeping a disorderly house. As the sentence was no more than could have been imposed for that crime, the question whether the evidence is sufficient to uphold the finding of the jury upon the charge of maintaining a public nuisance becomes immaterial. (Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Curio, 224 A.D. 766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

224 A.D. 766 (People v. Curio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Caruso
164 N.E. 106 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Polinsky v. . People
73 N.Y. 65 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)