People v. Cunningham

105 A.D.2d 752, 481 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant [753]*753from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Ritter, J.), rendered June 5, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, there was sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of Raymond Duncan, defendant’s conceded accomplice, to satisfy the requirement under CPL 60.22 (subd 1) (see, e.g., People v Glasper, 52 NY2d 970).

As to defendant’s challenge to the sentence imposed, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion nor is there any basis for this court to modify the sentence in its discretion (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cunningham, 105 A.D.2d 752, 481 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cunningham
214 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)