People v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cunningham

12 A.D.2d 633, 210 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 633 (People v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cunningham, 12 A.D.2d 633, 210 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing dismissed without prejudice, on the ground that such motion is premature. No appeal is presently pending, since it appears that no order has yet been entered on the decision of the County Court of Suffolk County, rendered October 5, 1960, denying defendant’s coram nobis application; and, consequently, no notice of appeal has been or can be filed or served. Defendant may renew this motion if he duly files and serves his notice of appeal after the service upon him by the District Attorney of a copy of the order which may have since been entered or which shall be entered on said decision. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing dismissed without prejudice, on the ground that such motion is premature. No appeal is presently pending, since it appears that no order has yet been entered on the decision of the County Court of Suffolk County, rendered October 5, 1960, denying defendant’s coram nobis application; and, consequently, no notice of appeal has been or can be filed or served. Defendant may renew this motion if he duly files and serves his notice of appeal after the service upon him by the District Attorney of a copy of the order which may have since been entered or which shall be entered on said decision. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 633, 210 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cunningham-nyappdiv-1960.