People v. Cunningham
419 N.E.2d 347, 52 N.Y.2d 927, 437 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2161
Opinion
*929 OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. In this case, in which the Appellate Division affirmed the findings made by the suppression court, we cannot say as a matter of law that probable cause to enter the apartment and to conduct a search was not established.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke .and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Cunningham, 419 N.E.2d 347, 52 N.Y.2d 927, 437 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2161 (N.Y. 1981).
419 N.E.2d 347 (People v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Pagan
173 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Tepperman v. New York City Transit Authority
133 Misc. 2d 788 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1986)
Brown v. City of New York
92 A.D.2d 15 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Veras v. Truth Verification Corp.
87 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)