People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman

59 N.E.2d 437, 293 N.Y. 841, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2260
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the record before us we conclude that the trial court erred when it charged as a matter of law that the witnesses Kivowitz and Arnold were not accomplices of the defendants in the crime of concealing and withholding stolen property in' New York County. That inquiry, we think, was one of fact for the jury. The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughkan, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman, 59 N.E.2d 437, 293 N.Y. 841, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2260 (N.Y. 1944).

59 N.E.2d 437 (People v. Cummings, Sharpe, Accobacco, Kligerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McKnight
281 P.2d 816 (Montana Supreme Court, 1955)