People v. Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cummings

19 A.D.3d 571, 796 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6882

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 20, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated August 22, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the appellant received effective assistance of counsel throughout the proceedings (see People v Valentine, 15 AD3d 463 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated August 22, 2003, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record indicates that the appellant received effective assistance of counsel throughout the proceedings (see People v Valentine, 15 AD3d 463 [2005]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

People v. Cummings, 19 A.D.3d 571, 796 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

19 A.D.3d 571 (People v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related