People v. Cummings

222 A.D.2d 518, 635 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cummings. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 A.D.2d 994

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered June 14, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the evidence failed to establish that the circumstances of his infant son’s death evinced a depraved indifference to human life (see, Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; People v Brammer, 189 AD2d 885; see also, People v Roe, 74 NY2d 20; People v Gomez, 65 NY2d 9; People v Register, 60 NY2d 270). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cummings, 222 A.D.2d 518, 635 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 518 (People v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Register
457 N.E.2d 704 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Roe
542 N.E.2d 610 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Brammer
189 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)