Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Cumberland

People v. Cumberland

139 A.D.3d 598, 30 N.Y.S.3d 824
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 2016
Docket1259 3192/02
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 598 (People v. Cumberland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cumberland, 139 A.D.3d 598, 30 N.Y.S.3d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obús, J.), rendered July 19, 2012, imposing an aggregate term of five years’ postrelease supervision as to certain convictions, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing terms of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]; see also People v Brinson, 21 NY3d 490 [2013]).

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Brinson
995 N.E.2d 144 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 598, 30 N.Y.S.3d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cumberland-nyappdiv-2016.