People v. Cumberbatch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cumberbatch

144 A.D.2d 575, 535 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 575 (People v. Cumberbatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cumberbatch, 144 A.D.2d 575, 535 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), both rendered February 27, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 1157/85, and attempted robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 690/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions have not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise them in the court of first instance by motions to vacate the judgments or otherwise (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Carter, 109 AD2d 747).

Counsel’s request to withdraw as counsel is denied (see, People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, 4, rearg denied 70 NY2d 748). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), both rendered February 27, 1986, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 1157/85, and attempted robbery in the first degree under indictment No. 690/85, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions have not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise them in the court of first instance by motions to vacate the judgments or otherwise (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Carter, 109 AD2d 747).

Counsel’s request to withdraw as counsel is denied (see, People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, 4, rearg denied 70 NY2d 748). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 575, 535 N.Y.S.2d 966, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cumberbatch-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack