People v. Culpepper
This text of 307 N.E.2d 48 (People v. Culpepper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: Each of defendant’s convictions is affirmed. No warrant appears in this record, however, for the increase in defendant’s sentences' predicated on Ms contumacious remark to the court. While we have sympathy for the feelings of the sentencing Judge, the increase cannot be justified under sentencing procedures nor supported under the guise of punishment for contempt of court. Accordingly, defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case is remitted with a direction to resentence defendant to the sentence originally imposed.
Concur: Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen, G-abbielli, Jones and Wachtleb. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 N.E.2d 48, 33 N.Y.2d 837, 351 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-culpepper-ny-1973.