People v. Culpepper

307 N.E.2d 48, 33 N.Y.2d 837, 351 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 879
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1973·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order modified and case remitted to Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: Each of defendant’s convictions is affirmed. No warrant appears in this record, however, for the increase in defendant’s sentences' predicated on Ms contumacious remark to the court. While we have sympathy for the feelings of the sentencing Judge, the increase cannot be justified under sentencing procedures nor supported under the guise of punishment for contempt of court. Accordingly, defendant’s sentence is vacated and the case is remitted with a direction to resentence defendant to the sentence originally imposed.

Concur: Judges Bubke, Bbeitel, Jasen, G-abbielli, Jones and Wachtleb. Taking no part: Chief Judge Fuld.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Culpepper, 307 N.E.2d 48, 33 N.Y.2d 837, 351 N.Y.S.2d 976, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 879 (N.Y. 1973).

307 N.E.2d 48 (People v. Culpepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adams
45 A.D.3d 1346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Brooks
283 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)