People v. Cullen

65 A.D.2d 594, 409 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13265
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 594 (People v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cullen, 65 A.D.2d 594, 409 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered September 9, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. Defendant agreed in Nassau County to assist a confidential informant in obtaining several pounds of peyote. Defendant, the informant, and a Nassau County undercover officer then drove to New York County in the officer’s car pursuant to directions given by the defendant. Upon arriving in Greenwich Village defendant instructed the officer to park his car while he went to obtain the peyote with $120 provided by the officer. He returned to the car with a brown paper bag containing the drug and handed it to the officer. From there the three men drove back to Nassau County. On these facts, the jury found defendant not guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled [595]*595substance in the third degree. Apparently, it found some merit in defendant’s agency defense. The only crime of which defendant was convicted took place entirely in New York County. His possession began and terminated there. Nassau County therefore lacked jurisdiction to prosecute defendant for that crime (see People v King, 61 AD2d 1035). Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cullen
77 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
People v. Cousart
74 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 A.D.2d 594, 409 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cullen-nyappdiv-1978.