People v. Cuddihi

54 Cal. 53
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1879
DocketNo. 10,440
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 54 Cal. 53 (People v. Cuddihi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cuddihi, 54 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1879).

Opinion

By the Court:

The demurrer to the indictment was sustained. The defendant has not filed any points in support of the demurrer, but the only ground that seems to require notice, is that more than one offense is charged in the indictment. The indictment recites that the defendant is accused by the grand jury of the crime of “ an assault with intent to commit murder, committed [54]*54as follows.” Following this is a statement of facts, showing that the defendant administered to John Nelson “ a large quantity of a certain deadly poison, called red oxide of mercury,” with the intent, etc., to murder said Nelson. The facts there stated appear to be sufficient to bring the case within the provisions of § 216 of the Penal Code; and they do not charge two offenses. The fact that the offense thus charged has not been given by the indictment its legal appellation, is not fatal to the indictment, as it is a mere irregularity in matter of form. The name given in the indictment to the offense charged, or sought to be charged, by the statement of facts constituting the offense, is not of itself the charge of an offense. (People v. Phipps, 39 Cal. 326.)

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the indictment. Bemittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Bergen
214 P. 521 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
People v. González
17 P.R. 1140 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)
Pueblo v. González
17 P.R. Dec. 1186 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)
Brady v. Territory of Arizona
60 P. 698 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1900)
Lee Yau v. Republic of Hawaii
11 Haw. 143 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1897)
State v. Jarvis
23 P. 251 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cal. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cuddihi-cal-1879.