People v. Cservak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cservak

243 A.D.2d 723, 665 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10713

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D.2d 723 (People v. Cservak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cservak, 243 A.D.2d 723, 665 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered October 3, 1996, convicting him of driving while intoxicated under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err in failing to afford him the opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing sentence. When the defendant fails to comply with a condition of his or her plea agreement, the court is not bound by its original sentencing promise and may unilaterally impose an enhanced sentence (see, People v Thorpe, 189 AD2d 903; People v Gamble, 111 AD2d 869).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI