People v. Cruzado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cruzado

2017 NY Slip Op 9151, 156 A.D.3d 899, 65 N.Y.S.3d 762

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2017·No. 2016-06875·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), imposed June 14, 2016, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal his conviction does not preclude appellate review of the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927-928 [2012]). The sentence, however, was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), imposed June 14, 2016, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal his conviction does not preclude appellate review of the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927-928 [2012]). The sentence, however, was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

People v. Cruzado, 2017 NY Slip Op 9151, 156 A.D.3d 899, 65 N.Y.S.3d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 9151 (People v. Cruzado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related