People v. Cruz

94 A.D.3d 503, 941 N.Y.S.2d 502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 A.D.3d 1496

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered March 15, 2011, resentencing defendant to a term [504]*504of 14 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). In any event, the resentencing proceeding was superfluous. Although the original commitment sheet did not mention PRS, the original sentencing court had imposed it orally, notwithstanding the court’s trivial error in terminology (see People v McFarland, 88 AD3d 547 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 860 [2011]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 94 A.D.3d 503, 941 N.Y.S.2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

94 A.D.3d 503 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. McFarland
88 A.D.3d 547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)