People v. Cruz

265 A.D.2d 197, 696 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10291
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D.2d 102

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered July 8, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years and 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant failed to preserve his present challenge to the court’s response to a note from the deliberating jury concerning the significance of the nonrecovery of prerecorded buy money, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that, viewing the charge and the supplemental charge as a whole (see, People v Garcia, 232 AD2d 270, lv denied 89 NY2d 922), the instructions properly conveyed the proper standards (see, People v Vincente, 180 AD2d 562, lv denied 79 NY2d 1008).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 265 A.D.2d 197, 696 N.Y.S.2d 678, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 197 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vincente
180 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Garcia
232 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)