People v. Cruz
This text of 609 N.E.2d 120 (People v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in defendant’s absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant’s remaining contention.
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Smith taking no part.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
609 N.E.2d 120, 81 N.Y.2d 738, 593 N.Y.S.2d 767, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 4223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cruz-ny-1992.