People v. Cruz

392 N.E.2d 565, 47 N.Y.2d 838, 418 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2112
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 5, 1979·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s wife, who on direct examination had not testified as a character witness, was cross-examined regarding defendant’s prior criminal record. While this was concededly error, such questioning did not rise to the level of constitutional error depriving defendant of a fair trial. In such circumstances, and in view of the court’s efforts to give curative instructions, the overwhelming evidence against defendant, and the lack of significant probability of acquittal absent such testimony, this cross-examination constituted harmless error (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 392 N.E.2d 565, 47 N.Y.2d 838, 418 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2112 (N.Y. 1979).

392 N.E.2d 565 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maier
77 A.D.3d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Jones
278 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Meeks
134 A.D.2d 290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Nielson
115 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Walls
70 A.D.2d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)