People v. Crum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crum

17 A.D.3d 712, 794 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.3d 712 (People v. Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crum, 17 A.D.3d 712, 794 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered February 6, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 14 years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and restitution. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Berke, J.), rendered February 6, 2004, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree and was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 14 years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision, and restitution. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.3d 712, 794 N.Y.S.2d 708, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crum-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack