People v. Crum

197 A.D.2d 936, 604 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9468
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 936 (People v. Crum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Crum, 197 A.D.2d 936, 604 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

[937]*937Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), counsel is required to notify defendant in writing of defendant’s right to appeal in all cases (People v Kieffer, 191 AD2d 1050). No exception is made in the case of defendants who waive their right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273). Present—Callahan, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FINSTER, FRANCIS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Finster
136 A.D.3d 1279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Serafini
197 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 936, 604 N.Y.S.2d 846, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crum-nyappdiv-1993.