People v. Cruceta-Castillo

2024 NY Slip Op 05418
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 2024
DocketSCI No. 3752/18 Appeal No. 2944 Case No. 2019-3962
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 05418 (People v. Cruceta-Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cruceta-Castillo, 2024 NY Slip Op 05418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Cruceta-Castillo (2024 NY Slip Op 05418)
People v Cruceta-Castillo
2024 NY Slip Op 05418
Decided on October 31, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 31, 2024
Before: Webber, J.P., Oing, Kapnick, Kennedy, JJ.

SCI No. 3752/18 Appeal No. 2944 Case No. 2019-3962

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Marcos Cruceta-Castillo, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Sylvia Lara Altreuter of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jamie Masten of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered February 15, 2019, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him to five years of probation concurrent with a jail term of nine months, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to his waiver of indictment is unpreserved and forfeited by his valid guilty plea (see People v Abreu, 189 AD3d 419, 420 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1055 [2021]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. The record demonstrates that defendant validly waived his right to be prosecuted by indictment (see id. at 419-420; see also People v Myers, 32 NY3d 18, 21, 23 [2018]), and that the Spanish language interpreter, who was present in court, translated the waiver of indictment for defendant (see Abreu, 189 AD3d at 420).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 31, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Abreu
2020 NY Slip Op 07146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Myers
32 N.Y.3d 18 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 05418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cruceta-castillo-nyappdiv-2024.