People v. Crowley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crowley

168 A.D.2d 744, 564 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 168 A.D.2d 744 (People v. Crowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crowley, 168 A.D.2d 744, 564 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered May 10, 1989, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence he received upon being found guilty of violating his probation is harsh and excessive. However, given defendant’s repeated violations of the terms of his probation, which included the failure to submit to substance abuse evaluation and to participate in treatment as well as his continued use of marihuana, there was no abuse of discretion by County Court in sentencing defendant to a prison term of lió to 4 years (see, People v Smith, 136 AD2d 867, lv denied 71 NY2d 1033).

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.), rendered May 10, 1989, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant’s only contention on this appeal is that the sentence he received upon being found guilty of violating his probation is harsh and excessive. However, given defendant’s repeated violations of the terms of his probation, which included the failure to submit to substance abuse evaluation and to participate in treatment as well as his continued use of marihuana, there was no abuse of discretion by County Court in sentencing defendant to a prison term of lió to 4 years (see, People v Smith, 136 AD2d 867, lv denied 71 NY2d 1033).

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 A.D.2d 744, 564 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crowley-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack