People v. Crouse

2019 NY Slip Op 1894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 2019
Docket74 KA 16-01787
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1894 (People v. Crouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Crouse, 2019 NY Slip Op 1894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Crouse (2019 NY Slip Op 01894)
People v Crouse
2019 NY Slip Op 01894
Decided on March 15, 2019
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 15, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

74 KA 16-01787

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

GERALD CROUSE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (RICHARD L. SULLIVAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (David W. Foley, A.J.), rendered September 14, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Contrary to defendant's contention, " the waiver of the right to appeal was not rendered invalid based on [County C]ourt's failure to require defendant to articulate the waiver in his own words' " (People v Scott, 144 AD3d 1597, 1597 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1150 [2017]). Defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal forecloses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Entered: March 15, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crouse-nyappdiv-2019.