People v. Cross

221 A.D.2d 357, 635 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cross. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 407

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[358]*358fendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered November 23, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Copertino, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cross, 221 A.D.2d 357, 635 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

221 A.D.2d 357 (People v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)