People v. Crosby

57 A.D.3d 1433, 869 N.Y.2d 813
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Crosby. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 A.D.3d 719

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a]). Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw his plea, which was based upon his alleged misunderstanding that he was pleading guilty to a violent felony (see People v Walton, 98 AD2d 842, 843 [1983]). The valid waiver by defendant of his right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Crosby, 57 A.D.3d 1433, 869 N.Y.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 1433 (People v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Walton
98 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)