People v. Cromer

2018 NY Slip Op 7535
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 2018·No. 7553 1210/16·Published

Opinion

People v Cromer (2018 NY Slip Op 07535)
People v Cromer
2018 NY Slip Op 07535
Decided on November 8, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 8, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Richter, Kahn, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

7553 1210/16

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Curtis Cromer, Defendant-Appellant.


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Beth R. Kublin of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Marc Whiten, J.), rendered June 29, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 8, 2018

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cromer, 2018 NY Slip Op 7535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 7535 (People v. Cromer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431