People v. Croce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Croce

61 A.D.2d 777, 402 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 777 (People v. Croce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Croce, 61 A.D.2d 777, 402 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 26, 1976, convicting defendant upon a verdict of the count of perjury in the first degree and sentencing her to an indeterminate term of one year to be served on weekends only, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating said sentence and in lieu thereof imposing a sentence of probation for a period of five years (Penal Law, § 65.00, subd 3, par [a], cl [i]). As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation. We have considered the probation report and the circumstances of this case and find that the imposition of a term of probation would be an appropriate sentence. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 26, 1976, convicting defendant upon a verdict of the count of perjury in the first degree and sentencing her to an indeterminate term of one year to be served on weekends only, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating said sentence and in lieu thereof imposing a sentence of probation for a period of five years (Penal Law, § 65.00, subd 3, par [a], cl [i]). As so modified, judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation. We have considered the probation report and the circumstances of this case and find that the imposition of a term of probation would be an appropriate sentence. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 777, 402 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-croce-nyappdiv-1978.