People v. Crisler

289 A.D.2d 1097, 738 N.Y.S.2d 259
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted, and orders entered December 27, 2000 are hereby vacated. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel submitted to the People a copy of the brief together with the proposed stipulation to the record, and then revised the brief based upon comments from the People. Upon our review of the record before us, we agree. Therefore, the orders of December 27, 2000 are vacated and this Court will [1098] consider the appeals de novo (see, People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046; see also, People v Vasquez, 70 NY2d 1, 4, rearg denied 70 NY2d 748). Defendant is directed to perfect the appeal on or before April 22, 2002. Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Crisler, 289 A.D.2d 1097, 738 N.Y.S.2d 259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 1097 (People v. Crisler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crisler
303 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)