People v. Crimm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crimm

2017 NY Slip Op 4675, 151 A.D.3d 1724, 53 N.Y.S.3d 844

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 2017

Docket726 KA 10-02419

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4675 (People v. Crimm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crimm, 2017 NY Slip Op 4675, 151 A.D.3d 1724, 53 N.Y.S.3d 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John L. DeMarco, J.), rendered October 6, 2010. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered June 10, 2016, decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings (140 AD3d 1672). The proceedings were held and completed.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, two counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1], [3]) and one *1725 count of assault in the first degree (§ 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant him youthful offender status (see People v Mohawk, 142 AD3d 1370, 1371 [2016]; People v Green, 128 AD3d 1282, 1283 [2015]). Furthermore, upon our review of the record, we see no reason to exercise our own discretion in the interest of justice to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender. Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John L. DeMarco, J.), rendered October 6, 2010. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered June 10, 2016, decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings (140 AD3d 1672). The proceedings were held and completed.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, two counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [1], [3]) and one *1725 count of assault in the first degree (§ 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant him youthful offender status (see People v Mohawk, 142 AD3d 1370, 1371 [2016]; People v Green, 128 AD3d 1282, 1283 [2015]). Furthermore, upon our review of the record, we see no reason to exercise our own discretion in the interest of justice to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender. Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 4675, 151 A.D.3d 1724, 53 N.Y.S.3d 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crimm-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack