People v. Crider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crider

78 A.D.2d 700, 434 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13230

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 700 (People v. Crider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crider, 78 A.D.2d 700, 434 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13230 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 7, 1979, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Under the circumstances of this case, at the time defendant was questioned by Detective William Noble he was in police custody and entitled to Miranda warnings. Absent such warnings, the statements made by the defendant to Detective Noble should have been suppressed. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 7, 1979, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Under the circumstances of this case, at the time defendant was questioned by Detective William Noble he was in police custody and entitled to Miranda warnings. Absent such warnings, the statements made by the defendant to Detective Noble should have been suppressed. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 700, 434 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crider-nyappdiv-1980.