People v. Crews

California Court of Appeal

People v. Crews

329 P.2d 550, 163 Cal. App. 2d 553, 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1537

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 16, 1958

DocketCrim. No. 2771

StatusPublished

This text of 329 P.2d 550 (People v. Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crews, 329 P.2d 550, 163 Cal. App. 2d 553, 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1537 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PEEK, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury verdict finding him guilty of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) and issuing a check without sufficient funds. (Pen. Code, § 476a.)

The record shows that defendant’s notice of appeal was filed on the eleventh day following the entry of judgment. The mere fact that the notice was prepared for defendant and filed by the prison records officer is insufficient to warrant application of the rule enunciated in People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal.2d 362 [181 P.2d 868], (See also People v. Head, 46 Cal.2d 886 [299 P.2d 872].) It necessarily follows that the appeal must be dismissed. (People v. Riser, 47 Cal.2d 594 [305 P.2d 18].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Van Dyke, P. J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEEK, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury verdict finding him guilty of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470) and issuing a check without sufficient funds. (Pen. Code, § 476a.)

The record shows that defendant’s notice of appeal was filed on the eleventh day following the entry of judgment. The mere fact that the notice was prepared for defendant and filed by the prison records officer is insufficient to warrant application of the rule enunciated in People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal.2d 362 [181 P.2d 868], (See also People v. Head, 46 Cal.2d 886 [299 P.2d 872].) It necessarily follows that the appeal must be dismissed. (People v. Riser, 47 Cal.2d 594 [305 P.2d 18].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Van Dyke, P. J., and Schottky, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 P.2d 550, 163 Cal. App. 2d 553, 1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crews-calctapp-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack