People v. Crescenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crescenzo

102 A.D.2d 829, 476 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Crescenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crescenzo, 102 A.D.2d 829, 476 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McNab, J.), rendered February 14, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, f Judgment affirmed. 11 The defendant improperly seeks vacatur of the judgment by way of an application to this court (CPL 440.10, 440.20). This application can only be brought in the court in which the judgment was entered (CPL 440.10, subd 1; 440.20). H We also find the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive to be without merit (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McNab, J.), rendered February 14, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, f Judgment affirmed. 11 The defendant improperly seeks vacatur of the judgment by way of an application to this court (CPL 440.10, 440.20). This application can only be brought in the court in which the judgment was entered (CPL 440.10, subd 1; 440.20). H We also find the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive to be without merit (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Weinstein and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 A.D.2d 829, 476 N.Y.S.2d 603, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crescenzo-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack