People v. Creighton

215 A.D.2d 685, 628 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5409
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered August 4, 1993, convicting her of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying a challenge for cause of a prospective juror. The record of the voir dire reveals that this juror did not possess a state of mind which would have precluded the defendant from receiving a fair trial (see, People v Williams, 63 NY2d 882; People v Torpey, 63 NY2d 361; People v Pagan, 191 AD2d 651).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Creighton, 215 A.D.2d 685, 628 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

215 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Creighton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tucker
221 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)