Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Cratsley

People v. Cratsley

91 A.D.3d 983, 937 N.Y.2d 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 5, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.3d 983 (People v. Cratsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cratsley, 91 A.D.3d 983, 937 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[984]*984Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, J.E, Kavanagh, Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ, concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 983, 937 N.Y.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cratsley-nyappdiv-2012.