People v. Cramer-Williams
This text of People v. Cramer-Williams (People v. Cramer-Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Cramer-Williams |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01665 |
| Decided on March 20, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 20, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, OGDEN, GREENWOOD, AND HANNAH, JJ.
124 KA 23-01416
v
VICTOR CRAMER-WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ERIN A. TRESMOND OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. KEANE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (PAUL J. WILLIAMS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (James F. Bargnesi, J.), rendered July 24, 2023. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and therefore does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Harrison, 242 AD3d 1540, 1541 [4th Dept 2025]; People v Swiderski, 217 AD3d 1416, 1417 [4th Dept 2023]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. As the People correctly concede, however, both the certificate of conviction and the uniform sentence and commitment form must be corrected to reflect defendant's status as a second felony offender rather than a second violent felony offender (see People v Portis, 224 AD3d 1317, 1318-1319 [4th Dept 2024], lv denied 41 NY3d 985 [2024]).
Entered: March 20, 2026
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Cramer-Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cramer-williams-nyappdiv-2026.