People v. Crabtree

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Crabtree

184 A.D.2d 374, 587 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 374 (People v. Crabtree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Crabtree, 184 A.D.2d 374, 587 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered December 12, 1990, convicting defendant after a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Upon our independent review of the evidence, we discern no basis to disturb the jury’s determination of credibility or resolution of the competing inferences that might be drawn from that evidence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey Atlas, J.), rendered December 12, 1990, convicting defendant after a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Upon our independent review of the evidence, we discern no basis to disturb the jury’s determination of credibility or resolution of the competing inferences that might be drawn from that evidence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 374, 587 N.Y.S.2d 142, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-crabtree-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack