People v. Cox

177 A.D.2d 963, 577 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15692
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1991·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was arrested based upon probable cause provided by an eyewitness to a crime defendant had committed (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423). Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from her purse because the search and seizure were incident to the lawful arrest (see, United States v Robinson, 414 US 218, 235; People v Weintraub, 35 NY2d 351, 354) and the arresting officer reasonably believed that the purse might contain a weapon or stolen property (see, People v Smith, 59 NY2d 454, 458-459; People v Johnson, 59 NY2d 1014, 1016; cf., People v Gokey, 60 NY2d 309). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Attempted Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present—Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cox, 177 A.D.2d 963, 577 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

177 A.D.2d 963 (People v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bell
286 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Barclay
201 A.D.2d 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Flores
187 A.D.2d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)