People v. Cowan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cowan

54 A.D.2d 568, 387 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cowan, 54 A.D.2d 568, 387 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 11, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Inasmuch as defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree, the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, under the facts herein, must be reversed and the said count dismissed as an inclusory concurrent count. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 11, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Inasmuch as defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree, the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, under the facts herein, must be reversed and the said count dismissed as an inclusory concurrent count. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 568, 387 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cowan-nyappdiv-1976.