People v. Cowan

157 N.E. 846, 245 N.Y. 532, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 687
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 7, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Assigned counsel for defendant has lost his right to compensation by letting the time pass to bring case on for argument without applying to the court for an extension thereof. The court may, in a proper case and in the exercise of discretion, enlarge the time to bring the case on for argument after it has expired in order to prevent a dismissal, but in a case of murder in the first-degree, counsel’s delay in applying for such enlargement within the time fixed by section 536 forfeits his right to compensation. (People v. Chapman, 225 N. Y. 700.)

Application for compensation denied. Application for payment of personal and incidental expenses allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cowan, 157 N.E. 846, 245 N.Y. 532, 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 687 (N.Y. 1927).

157 N.E. 846 (People v. Cowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the City of New York
250 A.D. 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
People v. Mummiani
180 N.E. 673 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
People v. Pennestri
171 N.E. 77 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)