People v. Covert

2018 NY Slip Op 1325
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 2018
Docket2017-00127
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1325 (People v. Covert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Covert, 2018 NY Slip Op 1325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Covert (2018 NY Slip Op 01325)
People v Covert
2018 NY Slip Op 01325
Decided on February 28, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 28, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-00127
(Ind. No. 16-00639)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Gwen Covert, appellant.


Jason M. Bernheimer, Katonah, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Barbara Zambelli, J.), rendered December 6, 2016, convicting her of driving while intoxicated as a felony in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(3), upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-covert-nyappdiv-2018.