People v. Covert

233 A.D.2d 899, 649 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13386

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926), is legally sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.70 [1] [c]) and rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [3]; § 20.00; see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon weighing the relative probative force of the conflicting testimony, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, supra, at 495).

Considering the heinous nature of the offenses, defendant’s sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe, and we decline to exercise our power to modify it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Seneca County Court, Falvey, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Covert, 233 A.D.2d 899, 649 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 899 (People v. Covert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
644 N.E.2d 1367 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)