People v. Coutin

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Coutin

78 N.Y.2d 930

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 1, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 78 N.Y.2d 930 (People v. Coutin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coutin, 78 N.Y.2d 930 (N.Y. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant has been convicted of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10). The only issue presented on this appeal is whether defendant’s motion to sup[932]*932press the evidence found in the car should have been granted. Evidence in the record supports Supreme Court’s undisturbed findings and these findings provide a legally sufficient basis for the determination that the police officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car occupied by defendant, reasonable concern for their safety in approaching the car with their weapons drawn and ordering defendant and the other occupants to alight, and probable cause to search the interior of the car for a weapon and evidence of the crime.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant has been convicted of two counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10). The only issue presented on this appeal is whether defendant’s motion to sup[932]*932press the evidence found in the car should have been granted. Evidence in the record supports Supreme Court’s undisturbed findings and these findings provide a legally sufficient basis for the determination that the police officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car occupied by defendant, reasonable concern for their safety in approaching the car with their weapons drawn and ordering defendant and the other occupants to alight, and probable cause to search the interior of the car for a weapon and evidence of the crime.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 N.Y.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coutin-ny-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack