People v. Coutant
Opinion
Aarons, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered March 24, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and the plea agreement included the waiver of the right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant, as a prior felony offender, to five years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.
We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, his waiver of *1016 the right to appeal was valid. County Court explained that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by a guilty plea and confirmed that defendant understood the ramifications of the waiver. Defendant thereafter executed a counseled written waiver in open court. Under these circumstances, we conclude that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Mydosh, 117 AD3d 1195, 1195-1196 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 963 [2014]; People v Koumjian, 101 AD3d 1175, 1175 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 1100 [2013]). Therefore, defendant’s contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive is precluded from our review (see People v Miller, 137 AD3d 1485, 1485 [2016]; People v Crispell, 136 AD3d 1121, 1122 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1149 [2016]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
143 A.D.3d 1015 (People v. Coutant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.