People v. Couser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Couser

266 A.D.2d 839, 698 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Couser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Couser, 266 A.D.2d 839, 698 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 20.00, 160.15 [3]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in determining that statements not contained in the CPL 710.30 notice would be admissible at trial. “By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his right to seek reversal of his conviction on the ground that evidence is inadmissible because the prosecution failed to provide the notice required by CPL 710.30” (People v Hardy, 187 AD2d 810, 812, citing People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siragusa, J.— Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 20.00, 160.15 [3]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in determining that statements not contained in the CPL 710.30 notice would be admissible at trial. “By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his right to seek reversal of his conviction on the ground that evidence is inadmissible because the prosecution failed to provide the notice required by CPL 710.30” (People v Hardy, 187 AD2d 810, 812, citing People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Siragusa, J.— Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 839, 698 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-couser-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack