People v. Courtney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Courtney

38 A.D.2d 790, 328 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5585

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 790 (People v. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Courtney, 38 A.D.2d 790, 328 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law to the extent of vacating the sentence and case remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In response to the question of whether he had legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced, prior to being resentenced in 1970 as a multiple felony offender, appellant referred to a prior conviction in 1947 and stated to the court “Your honor, I would like to challenge that prior conviction”. The court denied his request and stated that this might be done by appeal. In our opinion, the procedure followed by the sentencing court violated section 1943 of the former Penal Law, which was the controlling statute when the crime was committed. The court should have held a hearing to determine the issue raised by appellant before sentencing him as a second offender (People v. Wilkins, 28 N Y 2d 213; People v. Di Giangiemo, 34 A D 2d 960; People v. Webster, 32 A D 2d 557). The District Attorney, with commendable candor concedes that the case must be remitted for resentencing in the manner herein indicated. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court resentencing defendant on conviction for burglary, third degree.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law to the extent of vacating the sentence and case remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In response to the question of whether he had legal cause to show why judgment should not be pronounced, prior to being resentenced in 1970 as a multiple felony offender, appellant referred to a prior conviction in 1947 and stated to the court “Your honor, I would like to challenge that prior conviction”. The court denied his request and stated that this might be done by appeal. In our opinion, the procedure followed by the sentencing court violated section 1943 of the former Penal Law, which was the controlling statute when the crime was committed. The court should have held a hearing to determine the issue raised by appellant before sentencing him as a second offender (People v. Wilkins, 28 N Y 2d 213; People v. Di Giangiemo, 34 A D 2d 960; People v. Webster, 32 A D 2d 557). The District Attorney, with commendable candor concedes that the case must be remitted for resentencing in the manner herein indicated. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court resentencing defendant on conviction for burglary, third degree.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 790, 328 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-courtney-nyappdiv-1972.