People v. Courtney

67 Cal. App. 658
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 12, 1924
DocketCrim. No. 1178
StatusPublished

This text of 67 Cal. App. 658 (People v. Courtney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Courtney, 67 Cal. App. 658 (Cal. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

LANGDON, P. J.

The defendant was charged with rape, accomplished by force and violence. The evidence introduced to support the charge leaves no possible doubt of defendant’s guilt. This evidence stands unchallenged, as no testimony was offered by the defendant.

The points raised by appellant are trivial and devoid of any merit whatsoever and not worthy of discussion here. Under the circumstances, no useful purpose could be served by setting forth a statement of the facts and thereby spreading the filth of this record over the pages of the Appellate Reports.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Nourse, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Cal. App. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-courtney-calctapp-1924.